History
and Introduction
The
Inter-state highway system holds a special place in the hearts of many
Americans even to this date. It came to be formed around the same time TV was
discovered. Though the invention of the Television is much celebrated the
formation of the interstate highway system is something that is much more
significant and impactful in the lives of the people living in the US. This is
something that was created as a result of the work and toil of many people
including labours, engineers, policymakers and government officials etc. This
was the realization of a dream for people who have worked behind for years. President
Dwight D Eisenhower signed the National System of Interstate and Defense
Highway Bill in the year 1956. This was the legislation the pioneered America's
development of The Interstate Highway System. The speciality of this was that
the Federal Government worked in partnership with the State government to
construct these infrastructures. Highways in the states were constructed by the
funds given by the Federal Government. The designs and planning also had to be approved
by the Federal Agents. America’s Highway program was in direct control and
influence of the Federal government right from the planning to construction and
even repairs and reconstruction.
The Issue
of Funds for HTF (A
FEDERAL GAS TAX FOR THE FUTURE)
The HTF
is responsible for the highway constructions. Majority of its fund comes from
the gas tax. Tax on gasoline and diesel pay for 82 % of the countries Transport
funds. The amount is estimated to be around $ 3 billion annually. The rate of
fuel tax is fixed at 18.4 cents per gallons of gasoline and 24.4 cents per
gallon for diesel since 1993. At this rate, the revenue collected by the
Federal Government from the gas tax is very low concerning the high
infrastructure construction and development demand of the United States today.
The increasing cost of construction along with reduced use of gasoline by the
drivers have put a severe strain on the amount of revenue collected. While more
gasoline efficient cars are resulting in less gas purchase by the people the
cost of building the highways and other infrastructure continues to rise. We
can say that with time, the more money is being needed for the projects but the
revenue that is coming in is lowering day by day. The Federal gas tax is not
included in the inflation and its tax rate remains constant at 18.4 cents per
gallon.
(CONGRESSIONAL
RESEARCH SERVICE)This paints a clear picture of a shortage of fund in the
Highway Transportation Fund. These deficit is being fulfilled by the Federal
Treasury’s Deficit Fund for many years now. Congress has provided about
$143.6 billion already since 2008. The ‘Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
Act’ signed by President Barack Obama in 2015 paid for $70 billion of these
deficits. (CRS) Shortly all accounts that provide for the deficit of the
transport sector will be exhausted unless serious changes are brought about in
the Gas tax rate and modes or revenue collection. I believe if we continue on
the same path of raising The Highway Transportation Fund from the age-old law,
which is fixed at 18.4 cents per gallons of gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon
for diesel the deficit of fund collection is going to rise every year until it
becomes a burden too heavy to bear. Steps need to be taken to solve this
problem so that we can move toward a better infrastructure and Road
development.
SOLUTIONS
and ARGUMENT
Readjusting
The Gas Tax- In such a situation of the fiscal deficit, a good way to restore some balance in the revenue and
expenditure of the HTF would be to increase the gas tax rate according to the
inflation. From 18.3 cent per gallon, the price of gasoline could be raised to
31.8 cents per gallon. The tax on diesel could be raised from 24.3 cents per gallon
to 42.2 cents per gallon.
According
to the Congressional Research Service, this an increase in one penny can raise
the fund by $1.8 billion per year. However, as there are more fuel-efficient
and electric cars in the market these days that would also cause reduced use of
gasoline or diesel. Therefore, this solution cannot be a permanent saviour to
the HTF’s fund crisis but can be an effective way to progress with some
additional collection for the next few coming years.
Fund
from Sales Tax- Tax can be charged
based on the percentage of retail fuel price rather per gallons used. In this
way, the public has to pay a sales tax on every purchase. Shortly even if the
consumption reduces, the tax can be charged on the retail price of fuel and not
on gallons purchased. This comes with a negative possibility too. That is
if the prices of fuel were to fall sharply the rate of tax or fund being
collected by this method would also fall. This could have on the HTF’s fund.
This would be a good solution to collect Highway Transport Funds through
Federally imposed sales tax on fuel. Again if more hybrid electronic cars take
over the scene in the next years there could be fund crisis for the HTF’s
treasury
Vehicle
Miles Travelled Charges (VMT) –
This method of charging a driver according to the distance he or she has
travelled can be a good way to collect transport funds. The total cost of road
use can include wear and tear charges, air pollution charges and traffic
congestion.
The
distances travelled by the vehicles can be estimated from the ode meter or even
through a GPS tracking system. However, installing GPS on all vehicles is a
very expensive procedure. It also intrudes the personal privacy of the public.
Administrating and collecting tax from such a huge population would also have
its difficulties.
Carbon
Taxes- Vehicles could be
charged on the number of emissions. This would also ensure that drivers use
less emitting technologies that would protect the environment. The carbon taxes
could partially be given for the Highway development
Electric
Vehicle’s Fee- The electric vehicles do not have to pay for fuel taxes.
Therefore, they can be charged an extra fee from the Federal government. Slowly
electric vehicles will be more popular which will result in the reduction of
gasoline and diesel vehicles. That would mean a considerable reduction in the
Highway Transport Fund. To mitigate this loss of fund the Congress can
implement a system of tax collection from the electric vehicles and these funds
can be given for Highway and Road development.
Tolling
or Congestion Pricing: the US has
about 20 of the world’s most congested cities and with an increasing number of
population and vehicles these congestions will increase and spread to other
cities too. Collecting congestion tax can be a good way to gain funds for
the Transport sector in the US. Funds from tolls that reach the Transport The development sector is very low so unless there is a high rise in the toll
taxes this option cannot be explored for our purpose.
Even
though the federal governments manage and plan the HTF’s projects the fund from
tolls reach private institutions or local governments. So charging congestion
taxes under the Federal administration would be the best choice for raising the
funds for the HTF
Role
of Private Business: No
matter what policy is implemented, we see that they all come with drawbacks and
are unable to address long-term challenges. One fact that stands constant is
that funds from the Federal sources are limited and shrinking. On the other
hand, the need for developing transit infrastructure is ever-growing.
A partnership between the public sector and private businesses can reduce the
stress on the government bodies while meeting the demand of the infrastructural
needs of the countries Highway Transportation Fund. It is the state and local the government that works with private businesses. Generally, private institution
leases a government asset in exchange for future benefits revenue. They may
also introduce a new asset or service in the transit or highways for the public
to use.
The private business makes a new service or an asset available to the public for use and it is the government that pays an amount to the private firms. This is done because the people would not have paid for services directly from the private owner. When these facilities are under the government they are available, free of cost to the people. The Private-public partnerships do face ideological and political opposition but there are more advantages to this prospect. Private sector involvement can bring about more efficiency in management, operation and innovation of the transport sector and its fund's allocation and expenditure. Since involving the private sector can ensure long term project assessment and reduction in time loss and dispute this would directly reduce the cost incurred by the state local and federal government in the transport and highway sector.
We can
note from the above analysis that sticking to the old fundraising method of
18.4 cents per gallons of gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel does
not fulfil the demand of the current construction expenses. Besides, this rate
of pricing involving gallons as a unit of calculation of the fund to be paid by
users is obsolete. Where vehicles are becoming more fuel-efficient there is a
call for an immediate need to change the way funds for the HTF is raised. The
immediate thing to do would be to follow the Congressional Research Service’s
recommendation and increase the rate of charges per gallons of gasoline and
diesel. However soon as more and more vehicles will become fuel-efficient and
electricity runs we have to be ready for charging taxes under the VMT method.
This will also reduce the risk of automobile theft as there is a need to install
GPS in the vehicles.
The
federal treasury cannot fulfil the Transport deficit very soon so what would
be the vision ahead. Including the Private sectors is the perfect thing to do.
It will not only allocate funds but also new assets and result in the
development of better quality projects. There will be clear monitoring and
investment of funds on behalf of the State by the private sectors. Besides,
this will make sure that the projects comply with the air quality standard
imposed by the Environment Protection Agency that was formed by the 1970 clean
air Act. Concerning the National Environmental Policy Act 1969 and the Clean Air
Act 1970 implementing a strong Carbon tax will not only help in reducing
vehicles with high carbon emission but also be a source of revenue for Highway
Transportation Fund. It is not only the Federal, State and Local
governments along with the private companies that need to help to make the
transport sectors funding and quality better but we as citizens too have a big
role. We as citizens can let the authorities know exactly where the development
projects are needed and what the progress of current projects are. This will
save the time effort and money of many officials and bring about better
results. Citizens should be involved in the transport sectors development
projects through attending community meetings held in their respective
localities. You can give the best transport solutions in your area. Provide
input via email be a member of the citizens advisory committee and also invite
transport officials to your local clubs to hold discussions about how everyone
can contribute.
In
conclusion, I would like to say that it is high time that the officials both
from the state and the congress along with the public, in general, get
conscious about the importance of Highway Road Transportation and Transit
services. We must modernize our approach to allocating funds for the Highway
Transportation Fund so that every other aspect of our lives stay in balance and
we get to live a high standard of life in every region of the United States.
Reference:
Crsreports.congress.gov.
2020. CRS Reports. [online] Available at:
<https://crsreports.congress.gov> [Accessed 16 September 2020].
ITEP.
2020. A Federal Gas Tax For The Future. [online] Available at:
<https://itep.org/a-federal-gas-tax-for-the-future/> [Accessed 16
September 2020].
SEEY,
B., 2006. INTERSTATE’S ANNIVERSARY. [online] Onlinepubs.trb.org.
Available at: <http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/trnews/trnews244.pdf>
[Accessed 16 September 2020].
Slideshare.net. n.d. Citizen Guide To Transportation Decision Making. [online] Available at: <https://www.slideshare.net/StateofUtah/citizen-guide-to-transportation-decision-making> [Accessed 16 September 2020].
No comments:
Post a Comment